Banner
any day today rss X

News and Comment May 2022

Index: 2018201920202021202220232024

12 May - Was it a landslide?

For me the worst thing about elections is updating the list of Councillors. It is assembled from 45 data files and with so many of them changing this year there was a whole load to amend. The details will be added later after the Leader has dished out her favours to those without minds of their own.

Meanwhile more analytical minds have been digging into the statistics so that when the Leader gives her next report to Full Council and claims to be Trusted by Bexley Residents we will be able to judge whether it is really true or not.

One of the basics for any analysis has to be the size of the electorate but Bexley Council only provides the percentage of the vote achieved by each candidate and if you ask for the number eligible to vote they refer you to their website. The number is hidden away on the Notice of Poll forms where the number entitled to vote at each Polling Station is given. You have to add them up for yourself.

In my ward for example there were eight Polling Stations with 1,282, 1,758, 1,653, 1,461, 1,531, 1,521, 1,140 and 1,435 eligible voters. That’s 11,781 people who had three votes each. 35,343 votes. Sally Hinkley topped the poll with 2,033 votes with Esther Amaning and Daniel Francis trailing her with 1,998 and 1,956 respectively.

The Council’s website credits Labour with 60% of the vote but in truth only 5,987 little crosses out of a possible total of 35,343 were cast for them. 29,356 potential crosses were not placed next to Labour names.

Is it mischievous to suggest that 83·1% of the electorate didn’t vote Labour in Belvedere?

Belvedere is used here only as an example but while I have been playing with computer code my old friend Nicholas Dowling, Independent candidate in Blackfen and Lamorbey in 2014, created a spreadsheet with all the numbers,

It showed that Belvedere is typical of the seventeen wards. See table below which includes who won each ward and the percentages of votes not cast for that winning party…

 

Barnehurst - Labour : 80·9
Belvedere - Labour : 83·1
Bexleyheath - Conservative : 82·0
Blackfen & Lamorbey Conservative : 82·7
Blendon & Penhill - Conservative : 81·9
Crayford - Conservative : 83·8
Crook Log - Conservative : 81·4
East Wickham - Conservative : 84·4
Erith - Labour : 81·7
Falconwood & Welling - Conservative : 84·1
Longlands - Conservative : 81·4
Northumberland Heath - Labour : 82·7
Sidcup - Conservative : 84·2
Slade Green & Northend : Labour : 85·6
St. Mary’s St. James - Conservative : 81·2
Thamesmead East - Labour : 83·3
West Heath - Conservative : 80·5


Maybe when Saint Teresa next claims that the Council is Trusted by Bexley Residents she will acknowledge that it’s only one in five of them.

Is this an argument for compulsory voting or for proportional representation?

 

Return to the top of this page
Bonkers is a cookie free zone. Not a single one