The unusual site banners are to bring attention to the fact that Labour activists in Bexley are manipulating Facebook Groups with fictional posters. They deny it, threaten police action for ‘harassing’ a fictitious character and then demonstrate their willingness to impersonate by creating a false Administrator account in my name. The banner on display is chosen randomly from a selection of three, with a fourth bearing the familiar Bexley Council is Bonkers logo.
20 November (Part 2) - What is it that Bexley council has against cyclists?
Like
most public authorities, Bexley council’s number one priority is keeping
themselves in well paid employment at taxpayers’ expense. Hence the non-stop fiddling around with road layouts, sometimes
putting right the idiocies of a few years earlier, sometimes creating new ones.
A common theme running across many recent developments is a desire to put
cyclists at maximum risk. Narrow roads are not only a “recipe for head on
collisions” as a safety consultant once told me but they put cyclists closer to
other traffic. Even worse is an abrupt narrowing such that a momentary lack of
concentration can put a cyclist under the wheels of a bus.
One
might argue that narrow roads make pedestrian crossings safer but that theory is not always
borne out in practice. Occasionally roads have been narrowed to the point that
a central pedestrian refuge can no longer be accommodated.
Long Lane being a recent example.
But it keeps Bexley’s bureaucrats employed and FM Conway in the money. Nothing else seems to matter.
Note: The pedestrian crossing shown is of the original after the road was made narrower
and the central refuge removed. A new and similar crossing was provided a few metres to the south. Note the
re-sited pole and the tactile paving. The black patch is where the pedestrian refuge used to be.